On Sun, Apr 22, 2007 at 10:18:32PM +1000, Con Kolivas wrote:
> On Sunday 22 April 2007 21:42, Con Kolivas wrote:
>
> Willy I'm still investigating the idle time and fluctuating load as a separate
> issue.
OK.
> Is it possible the multiple ocbench processes are naturally
> synchronising and desynchronising and choosing to sleep and/or run at the
> same time?
I don't think so. They're independant processes, and I insist on reducing
their X work in order to ensure they don't get perturbated by external
factor. Their work consist in looping 250 ms and waiting 750 ms, then
displaying a new progress line.
> I can remove the idle time entirely by running ocbench at nice 19
> which means they are all forced to run at basically the same time by the
> scheduler.
It may indicate some special handling of nice ?
> Anyway the more important part is... Can you test this patch please? Dump
> all the other patches I sent you post 045. Michael, if you could test too
> please?
OK, I will restart from fresh 0.45 and try again.
Regards,
Willy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
