Re: [patch 20/20] Add apply_to_page_range() which applies a function to a pte range.

Matt Mackall wrote:
> Haven't thought a huge amount about that. Perhaps it's best done with
> the level 3 callback?
>   

Level 2, I think, assuming you count the pte pages as level 1.  I think
it can be dealt with, so long as it correctly skips level 1 callbacks
for superpages, and does the test after the level 2 callback has returned.

    J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [patch 20/20] Add apply_to_page_range() which applies a function to a pte range.
    • From: Matt Mackall <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: [patch 20/20] Add apply_to_page_range() which applies a function to a pte range.
    • From: Matt Mackall <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 20/20] Add apply_to_page_range() which applies a function to a pte range.
    • From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 20/20] Add apply_to_page_range() which applies a function to a pte range.
    • From: Matt Mackall <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 10/28] i386: map enough initial memory to create lowmem mappings
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] nfs lockd reclaimer: Convert to kthread API
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch 20/20] Add apply_to_page_range() which applies a function to a pte range.
• Next by thread: Re: [patch 20/20] Add apply_to_page_range() which applies a function to a pte range.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]