Madhusudhan c wrote: > > The bus test procedure from this patch can be adopted to the MMCv4 > support in the MMC core with small changes to do bus testing procedure > only if the host sets the capability to support 8-bit. That way we > dont break the legacy code. What do you think? > Until 8-bit SD shows up, at which point things go to hell again. You need to present a valid case for why we need this bus testing stuff. The spec never requires it, and neither does any cards. So this is just crud that we know causes problems and doesn't give us anything back. Rgds Pierre
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: MMCv4 support (8-bit support missing)
- From: "Madhusudhan c" <[email protected]>
- Re: MMCv4 support (8-bit support missing)
- References:
- MMCv4 support (8-bit support missing)
- From: "Madhusudhan c" <[email protected]>
- Re: MMCv4 support (8-bit support missing)
- From: Pierre Ossman <[email protected]>
- Re: MMCv4 support (8-bit support missing)
- From: "Madhusudhan c" <[email protected]>
- Re: MMCv4 support (8-bit support missing)
- From: Pierre Ossman <[email protected]>
- Re: MMCv4 support (8-bit support missing)
- From: "Madhusudhan c" <[email protected]>
- MMCv4 support (8-bit support missing)
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] nfsv4 delegation: Convert to kthread API
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] nfs4state reclaimer: Remove unnecessary allow_signal
- Previous by thread: Re: MMCv4 support (8-bit support missing)
- Next by thread: Re: MMCv4 support (8-bit support missing)
- Index(es):
 |