Re: [PATCH 0/4] 2.6.21-rc7 NFS writes: fix a series of issues

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 

On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 10:14:02PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Apr 2007, Florin Iucha wrote:
> > 
> > Already did.  Traces from vanilla kernel at
> >    http://iucha.net/nfs/21-rc7/big-copy
> 
> Well, there's a pdflush in io_schedule_timeout/congestion_wait, and 
> there's a nfsv4-scv in svc_recv/nfs_callback_sv, and a lot of processes 
> either just in schedule_timeout or similar "normal" waiting (pollwait 
> etc).
> 
> [ The call traces could be prettier, but sadly, even if you enable frame 
>   pointers, the x86-64 kernel is too stupid to follow them. So you kind of 
>   just have to ignore the noise) ]
> 
> The triggering process looks like it might be that "cp", it is in the 
> __wait_on_bit/sync_page/wait_on_page_bit/wait_on_page_writeback_range/ 
> filemap_fdatawait.
> 
> Is this a trace from the "big copy" hang, or from a gnome splashscreen 
> hang? It *looks* like it's a big copy. Yes/no?

It *is* big copy.

I am monitoring the copy on the server, using "iostat 5".  It writes
for a while at a fairly constant pace (on ext3 *), then it drops to 0 in 5-10
seconds and stays there...  Once I left it for a couple of hours and
it did not pick up.

Regards,
florin

(*) XFS exhibited wild ups and downs in the transaction rate, and JFS
starts strong then loses steam and slowly settles to about half ext3's
rate.

-- 
Bruce Schneier expects the Spanish Inquisition.
      http://geekz.co.uk/schneierfacts/fact/163

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux