Re: [PATCH UPDATE] deflate stack usage in lib/inflate.c

Andi Kleen wrote:
>> (This was under Xen, but there's no reason it couldn't happen on bare
>>   hardware.)
>>     
>
> Hmm, does Xen perhaps not use interrupt stacks?

Looks like that's all done in do_IRQ, so it should be independent of
whether its Xen or not.  And the stack overflow check is performed on
the main stack, before switching to the interrupt stack.

    J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH UPDATE] deflate stack usage in lib/inflate.c
    • From: Chuck Ebbert <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH UPDATE] deflate stack usage in lib/inflate.c
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] deflate stack usage in lib/inflate.c
    • From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH UPDATE] deflate stack usage in lib/inflate.c
    • From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH UPDATE] deflate stack usage in lib/inflate.c
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: intermittant petabyte usage reported with broadcom nic
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH UPDATE] deflate stack usage in lib/inflate.c
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH UPDATE] deflate stack usage in lib/inflate.c
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH UPDATE] deflate stack usage in lib/inflate.c
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]