Re: [patch] high-res timers: UP resume fix

On Saturday, 7 April 2007 10:48, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-04-07 at 10:25 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> wrote:
> > 
> > > [...] Soeren, can you confirm that you are using a !CONFIG_SMP kernel, 
> > > and if yes, does the patch below fix the resume problem for you?
> > 
> > hm, you seem to have a CONFIG_SMP=y kernel. I dont immediately see where 
> > we re-enable interrupts in the SMP case, but could you try my patch 
> > nevertheless
> 
> We do in on_each_cpu() unconditionally. I missed that.

BTW, the on_each_cpu() in clock_was_set() is unnecessary, because
timekeeping_resume() is always run on one CPU.

Greetings,
Rafael
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [patch] high-res timers: UP resume fix
    • From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] high-res timers: UP resume fix
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: [patch] high-res timers: UP resume fix
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] high-res timers: UP resume fix
    • From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: possible NULL pointer usage
• Next by Date: Re: [patch] high-res timers: UP resume fix
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch] high-res timers: UP resume fix
• Next by thread: Re: [patch] high-res timers: UP resume fix
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]