Re: [patch 09/20] rename struct paravirt_patch to paravirt_patch_site for clarity

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 12:12:00 -0700 Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]> wrote:

> Rename struct paravirt_patch to paravirt_patch_site, so that it
> clearly refers to a callsite, and not the patch which may be applied
> to that callsite.

Needed a bit of updating for Andi's recently-merged
x86_64-mm-vmi-backend-for-paravirt-ops.patch but I think I got it
right.  We'll see if it compiles.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [patch 09/20] rename struct paravirt_patch to paravirt_patch_site for clarity
    • From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.9 won't compile
• Next by Date: Re: coding style for long conditions (WAS: Re: [PATCH 25/90] ... blinky leds!!)
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 2.6.21-rc5-rt12] IPV6: Flag bit of ebitmask is not set in __inet6_hash.
• Next by thread: Re: [patch 09/20] rename struct paravirt_patch to paravirt_patch_site for clarity
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]