Re: [PATCH 3/7] cxgb3 - FW version update

Jeff Garzik wrote:

Steve Wise wrote:

I would rather fix the code to use constants, and thus avoid this problem ever happening again.

    Jeff

How's this (not tested)?

seems OK to me

I tested it and resubmitted. Thanks fro the fix suggestion and the patch!

Cheers,
Divy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH 3/7] cxgb3 - FW version update
    • From: [email protected]
  • Re: [PATCH 3/7] cxgb3 - FW version update
    • From: Steve Wise <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 3/7] cxgb3 - FW version update
    • From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 3/7] cxgb3 - FW version update
    • From: Steve Wise <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 3/7] cxgb3 - FW version update
    • From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [PATCH 3/7] cxgb3 - FW version update
• Next by Date: Re: Make sure we populate the initroot filesystem late enough
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 3/7] cxgb3 - FW version update
• Next by thread: [PATCH 3/7] cxgb3 - FW version update
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]