Re: [patch 3/3] mm: fix PageUptodate memorder

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



What an unpleasing patchset.  I really really hope we really have a bug in
there, and that all this crap isn't pointless uglification.

We _do_ need a flush_dcaceh_page() in all cases which you're concerned
about.  Perhaps we should stick the appropriate barriers in there.

> On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 08:31:31 +0100 (CET) Nick Piggin <[email protected]> wrote:
> +static inline void SetNewPageUptodate(struct page *page)
> +{
> +	/*
> +	 * S390 sets page dirty bit on IO operations, which is why it is
> +	 * cleared in SetPageUptodate. This is not an issue for newly
> +	 * allocated pages that are brought uptodate by zeroing memory.
> +	 */
> +	smp_wmb();
> +	__set_bit(PG_uptodate, &(page)->flags);
> +}

__SetPageUptodate() might be more conventional.

Boy we'd better get the callers of this little handgrenade right.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux