Re: SLUB: The unqueued Slab allocator

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 10:42:23 -0800 (PST)
Christoph Lameter <[email protected]> wrote:

> > > G. Slab merging
> > > 
> > >    We often have slab caches with similar parameters. SLUB detects those
> > >    on bootup and merges them into the corresponding general caches. This
> > >    leads to more effective memory use.
> > 
> > Did you do any tests on what that does to long term memory fragmentation?
> > It is against the "object of same type have similar livetime and should
> > be clustered together" theory at least.
> 
> I have done no tests in that regard and we would have to assess the impact 
> that the merging has to overall system behavior.
> 
>From a viewpoint of a crash dump user, this merging will make crash dump
investigation very very very difficult.
So please avoid this merging if the benefit is nog big.

-Kame

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux