Re: [PATCH] mm/mincore: Return EFAULT when passed an invalid address.

On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 01:05:27AM +0000, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> No, I think you're getting confused by the way Linus uses access_ok
> on the address range given with the access_ok on the vector address.

	Whoops.  Sorry for the noise.

Joel

-- 

Life's Little Instruction Book #451

	"Don't be afraid to say, 'I'm sorry.'"

Joel Becker
Principal Software Developer
Oracle
E-mail: [email protected]
Phone: (650) 506-8127
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • mincore returning -ENOMEM instead of -EFAULT
    • From: Joel Becker <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH] mm/mincore: Return EFAULT when passed an invalid address.
    • From: Joel Becker <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] mm/mincore: Return EFAULT when passed an invalid address.
    • From: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Serial related oops
• Next by Date: Re: [patch 00/13] Syslets, "Threadlets", generic AIO support, v3
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] mm/mincore: Return EFAULT when passed an invalid address.
• Next by thread: Re: mincore returning -ENOMEM instead of -EFAULT
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]