Re: trivial question regarding byte ordering

• To: "Frederik Deweerdt" <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: trivial question regarding byte ordering
• From: "Allexio Ju" <[email protected]>
• Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 10:01:57 -0800
• Cc: [email protected]
• Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=bZDLT8rtQeZgGcQUsR6z2k5kvLQpUkpdffaLEr2TJMl9reBt7ruowvitBfL6aXRcp0LvTdO11yOao6SIzpYW5EHqllknAF0U1TQpAz5HmATAXceTEXgIVWuDzW4lFuOLEOMLZxztNaMUVLHg0Aq1iPOmPMO59qFyD50SZ5foJEE=
• Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=J2FhaQu7JwlUJPNDuwSEjP49VdKbmsuLVwNrfeNTNFnCT5yP5hUtgX7NPbSNSm6H1E6UBV8GoL1YXY26jX3J+toxb58WDYhE3tYKWQMsRbtocyCRqcOUJJrbik7OMiJDKtoPWRgsNTwXrI5PU05judviWL53TTHqb0UeXQYMwIA=
• In-reply-to: <20070223152411.GA31486@slug>
• References: <[email protected]> <20070223152411.GA31486@slug>
• Sender: [email protected]

On 2/23/07, Frederik Deweerdt <[email protected]> wrote:

including include/asm/byteorder.h will define the needed
cpu_to_{b,l}e{16,32,64} and {b,l}e{16,32,64}_to_cpu macros.

Great, Thank you for your answer.

Regards,

Allexio
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • trivial question regarding byte ordering
    • From: "Allexio Ju" <[email protected]>
  • Re: trivial question regarding byte ordering
    • From: Frederik Deweerdt <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: trivial question regarding byte ordering
• Next by Date: Re: [tipc-discussion] [RFC: 2.6 patch] net/tipc/: possible cleanups
• Previous by thread: Re: trivial question regarding byte ordering
• Next by thread: Re: trivial question regarding byte ordering
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]