Re: [patch 00/13] Syslets, "Threadlets", generic AIO support, v3

On Fri, 23 Feb 2007, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:

> On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 11:46:48AM -0800, Davide Libenzi ([email protected]) wrote:
> > 
> > A dynamic pool will smooth thread creation/freeing up by a lot.
> > And, in my box a *pthread* create/free takes ~10us, at 1000/s is 10ms, 1%. 
> > Bad, but not so aweful ;)
> > Look, I'm *definitely* not trying to advocate the use of async syscalls for 
> > network here, just pointing out that when we're talking about threads, 
> > Linux does a pretty good job.
>  
> If we are going to create 1000 threads each second, then it is better to
> preallocate them and queue a work to that pool - like syslets did with
> syscalls, but not ulitimately create a new thread just because it is not 
> that slow.

We do create a pool indeed, as I said in the opening of my asnwer. The 
numbers I posted was just to show that thread creation/destroy is pretty 
fast, but that does not justify it as a design choice.



> All such micro-thread designs are especially good in the case when 
> 1. switching is _rare_ (very)
> 2. programmer does not want to create complex model to achieve maximum
> performance
> 
> Disk (cached) IO definitely hits first entry and second one is there for
> advertisements and fast deployment, but overall usage of the
> asynchronous IO model is not limited to the above scenario, so
> micro-threads definitely hit own niche, but they can not cover all usage
> cases.

You know, I read this a few times, but I still don't get what your point 
is here ;) Are you talking about micro-thread design in the kernel as for 
kthreads usage for AIO, or about userspace?



- Davide


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [patch 00/13] Syslets, "Threadlets", generic AIO support, v3
    • From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [patch 00/13] Syslets, "Threadlets", generic AIO support, v3
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 00/13] Syslets, "Threadlets", generic AIO support, v3
    • From: "Michael K. Edwards" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 00/13] Syslets, "Threadlets", generic AIO support, v3
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 00/13] Syslets, "Threadlets", generic AIO support, v3
    • From: Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 00/13] Syslets, "Threadlets", generic AIO support, v3
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 00/13] Syslets, "Threadlets", generic AIO support, v3
    • From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 00/13] Syslets, "Threadlets", generic AIO support, v3
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 00/13] Syslets, "Threadlets", generic AIO support, v3
    • From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 00/13] Syslets, "Threadlets", generic AIO support, v3
    • From: Davide Libenzi <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 00/13] Syslets, "Threadlets", generic AIO support, v3
    • From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [rtc-linux] Re: [patch/rfc 0/6] rtc framework: remove class_device, use class suspend()/resume()
• Next by Date: Re: [rfc][patch] dynamic resizing dentry hash using RCU
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch 00/13] Syslets, "Threadlets", generic AIO support, v3
• Next by thread: Re: [patch 00/13] Syslets, "Threadlets", generic AIO support, v3
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]