Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 17:35:16 +1100
NeilBrown <[email protected]> wrote:
+ for (i = conf->raid_disks ; i-- ; ) {
That statement should be dragged out, shot, stomped on then ceremonially
incinerated.
What's wrong with doing
for (i = 0; i < conf->raid_disks; i++) {
in a manner which can be understood without alcoholic fortification?
I don't find either hard to read, but you suggestion isn't equivalent,
since it increments rather than decrements the index.
I admit I probably would write it the same way Neil did...
--
bill davidsen <[email protected]>
CTO TMR Associates, Inc
Doing interesting things with small computers since 1979
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
