Re: [PATCH] update ctime and mtime for mmaped write

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Miklos Szeredi wrote:
Why is the flag checked in __fput()?
It's because of this bit in the standard:

    If there is no such call and if the underlying file is modified
    as a result of a write reference, then these fields shall be
    marked for update at some time after the write reference.

It could be done in munmap/mremap, but it seemed more difficult to
track down all the places where the vma is removed.  But yes, that may
be a nicer solution.
It seems to me that, with this support, a file, which is mmap'd,
modified, but never msync'd or munmap'd, will never get its mtime
updated.  Or did I miss that?

I also don't see how an mmap'd block device will get its mtime
updated either.

__fput() will be called when there are no more references to 'file',
then it will update the time if the flag is set.  This applies to
regular files as well as devices.


I suspect that you will find that, for a block device, the wrong inode
gets updated.  That's where the bd_inode_update_time() portion of my
proposed patch came from.

But I've moved the check from __fput to remove_vma() in the next
revision of the patch, which would give slightly nicer semantics, and
be equally conforming.

This still does not address the situation where a file is 'permanently'
mmap'd, does it?

   Thanx...

      ps
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux