Re: [PATCH] Fix posix-cpu-timer breakage caused by stale p->last_ran value

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thomas Gleixner wrote:

Problem description at:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8048

Commit b18ec80396834497933d77b81ec0918519f4e2a7 [PATCH] sched: improve migration accuracy
optimized the scheduler time calculations, but broke posix-cpu-timers.

The problem is that the p->last_ran value is not updated after a context
switch. So a subsequent call to current_sched_time() calculates with a
stale p->last_ran value, i.e. accounts the full time, which the task was
scheduled away.

Could you expand on the impact of this bug for non-kernel hackers? :-)

I'm currently testing 2.6.20-rt5. My app runs in SCHED_RR and just blocks waiting for several signals. Since my app is the only SCHED_RR process running on the system, I get the impression that I'm not affected by this bug. Is that correct?

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>

Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
@@ -3566,7 +3566,7 @@ switch_tasks:
sched_info_switch(prev, next);
 	if (likely(prev != next)) {
-		next->timestamp = now;
+		next->timestamp = next->last_ran = now;
 		rq->nr_switches++;
 		rq->curr = next;
 		++*switch_count;

Regards,

John
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux