Re: [patch 00/13] Syslets, "Threadlets", generic AIO support, v3

* Suparna Bhattacharya <[email protected]> wrote:

> > maybe it will, maybe it wont. Lets try? There is no true difference 
> > between having a 'request structure' that represents the current 
> > state of the HTTP connection plus a statemachine that moves that 
> > request between various queues, and a 'kernel stack' that goes in 
> > and out of runnable state and carries its processing state in its 
> > stack - other than the amount of RAM they take. (the kernel stack is 
> > 4K at a minimum - so with a million outstanding requests they would 
> > use up 4 GB of RAM. With 20k outstanding requests it's 80 MB of RAM 
> > - that's acceptable.)
> 
> At what point are the cachemiss threads destroyed ? In other words how 
> well does this adapt to load variations ? For example, would this 80MB 
> of RAM continue to be locked down even during periods of lighter loads 
> thereafter ?

you can destroy them at will from user-space too - just start a slow 
timer that zaps them if load goes down. I can add a 
sys_async_thread_exit(nr_threads) API to be able to drive this without 
knowing the TIDs of those threads, and/or i can add a kernel-internal 
mechanism to zap inactive threads. It would be rather easy and 
low-overhead - the v2 code already had a max_nr_threads tunable, i can 
reintroduce it. So the size of the pool of contexts does not have to be 
permanent at all.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [patch 00/13] Syslets, "Threadlets", generic AIO support, v3
    • From: Suparna Bhattacharya <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [patch 00/13] Syslets, "Threadlets", generic AIO support, v3
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 00/13] Syslets, "Threadlets", generic AIO support, v3
    • From: "Michael K. Edwards" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 00/13] Syslets, "Threadlets", generic AIO support, v3
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 00/13] Syslets, "Threadlets", generic AIO support, v3
    • From: Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 00/13] Syslets, "Threadlets", generic AIO support, v3
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 00/13] Syslets, "Threadlets", generic AIO support, v3
    • From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 00/13] Syslets, "Threadlets", generic AIO support, v3
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 00/13] Syslets, "Threadlets", generic AIO support, v3
    • From: Suparna Bhattacharya <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] libata: add NCQ blacklist entries from Silicon Image Windows driver
• Next by Date: ACPI: ibm-acpi: fix initial status of backlight device
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch 00/13] Syslets, "Threadlets", generic AIO support, v3
• Next by thread: Re: [patch 00/13] Syslets, "Threadlets", generic AIO support, v3
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]