Re: [POWERPC] Mask 32-bit system call arguments to 32 bits on PPC64 in audit code

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 06:59:16PM +0000, Linux Kernel Mailing List wrote:
> Commit:     cfcd1705b61ecce1ab102b9593cf733fef314a19
> Parent:     0e47e3cca100e7c8e8124378e4e44969c2e042fd
> Author:     David Woodhouse <[email protected]>
> AuthorDate: Sun Jan 14 09:38:18 2007 +0800
> Committer:  Paul Mackerras <[email protected]>
> CommitDate: Wed Jan 24 21:13:58 2007 +1100
>  
>     [POWERPC] Mask 32-bit system call arguments to 32 bits on PPC64 in audit code
>     
>     The system call entry code will clear the high bits of argument
>     registers before invoking the system call; don't report whatever noise
>     happens to be in the high bits of the register before that happens.
>     
>     Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <[email protected]>
>     Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <[email protected]>
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c |   24 +++++++++++++++---------
>  1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>  
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c
> index 975102a..cc44c7b 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c
> @@ -532,16 +532,22 @@ void do_syscall_trace_enter(struct pt_regs *regs)
>  	    && (current->ptrace & PT_PTRACED))
>  		do_syscall_trace();
>  
> -	if (unlikely(current->audit_context))
> -		audit_syscall_entry(
> -#ifdef CONFIG_PPC32
> -				    AUDIT_ARCH_PPC,
> -#else
> -				    test_thread_flag(TIF_32BIT)?AUDIT_ARCH_PPC:AUDIT_ARCH_PPC64,
> +	if (unlikely(current->audit_context)) {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
> +		if (!test_thread_flag(TIF_32BIT))
> +			audit_syscall_entry(AUDIT_ARCH_PPC64,
> +					    regs->gpr[0],
> +					    regs->gpr[3], regs->gpr[4],
> +					    regs->gpr[5], regs->gpr[6]);
> +		else
>  #endif
> -				    regs->gpr[0],
> -				    regs->gpr[3], regs->gpr[4],
> -				    regs->gpr[5], regs->gpr[6]);
> +			audit_syscall_entry(AUDIT_ARCH_PPC,
> +					    regs->gpr[0],
> +					    regs->gpr[3] & 0xffffffff,
> +					    regs->gpr[4] & 0xffffffff,
> +					    regs->gpr[5] & 0xffffffff,
> +					    regs->gpr[6] & 0xffffffff);
> +	}
>  }
>  
>  void do_syscall_trace_leave(struct pt_regs *regs)

Why is this needed? The audit code is not supposed to look at the high bits
if the audited task is a compat task.
It does that at at least one place in kernel/auditsc.c:

	case 4: /* socketcall */
		return ((mask & AUDIT_PERM_WRITE) && ctx->argv[0] == SYS_BIND);

So does the audit code assume that the high bits are cleared or is this
a bug in the audit code?

-- 
Heiko Carstens
Linux on System z Development

IBM Deutschland Entwicklung GmbH
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Johann Weihen
Geschaeftsfuehrung : Herbert Kircher
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Boeblingen
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 243294
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux