Re: [PATCH 10/13] KVM: Wire up hypercall handlers to a central arch-independent location

Pavel Machek wrote:

On Mon 2007-02-19 10:30:52, Avi Kivity wrote:

Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <[email protected]>

changelog?

Well, I can't think of anything to add beyond $subject. The patch adds calls from the arch-dependent hypercall handlers to a new arch independent function.

+	switch (nr) {
+	default:
+		;
+	}

Eh?

No hypercalls defined yet.


--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: [kvm-devel] [PATCH 10/13] KVM: Wire up hypercall handlers to a central arch-independent location
    • From: "Dor Laor" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH 0/13] kvm updates for 2.6.21
    • From: Avi Kivity <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH 10/13] KVM: Wire up hypercall handlers to a central arch-independent location
    • From: Avi Kivity <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 10/13] KVM: Wire up hypercall handlers to a central arch-independent location
    • From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: ACPI: ibm-acpi: fix initial status of backlight device
• Next by Date: RE: [kvm-devel] [PATCH 10/13] KVM: Wire up hypercall handlers to a central arch-independent location
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 10/13] KVM: Wire up hypercall handlers to a central arch-independent location
• Next by thread: RE: [kvm-devel] [PATCH 10/13] KVM: Wire up hypercall handlers to a central arch-independent location
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]