Re: [-mm patch] UNION_FS must depend on SLAB

On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 08:18:39AM +0200, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> Pekka Enberg wrote:
> >The ksize exports we can add later if unionfs is to be merged.
> 
> Actually, we probably don't need it after the krealloc optimizations. I 
> think we need a new unionfs patch too... :)
 
I'm for it!
 
Josef "Jeff" Sipek.

-- 
Don't drink and derive. Alcohol and algebra don't mix.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • 2.6.20-mm2
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • [-mm patch] UNION_FS must depend on SLAB
    • From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
  • Re: [-mm patch] UNION_FS must depend on SLAB
    • From: "Pekka Enberg" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [-mm patch] UNION_FS must depend on SLAB
    • From: Josef Sipek <[email protected]>
  • Re: [-mm patch] UNION_FS must depend on SLAB
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: [-mm patch] UNION_FS must depend on SLAB
    • From: Josef Sipek <[email protected]>
  • Re: [-mm patch] UNION_FS must depend on SLAB
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: [-mm patch] UNION_FS must depend on SLAB
    • From: Pekka Enberg <[email protected]>
  • Re: [-mm patch] UNION_FS must depend on SLAB
    • From: Pekka Enberg <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [-mm patch] UNION_FS must depend on SLAB
• Next by Date: Re: Weird hard disk noise on shutdown (bug #7674)
• Previous by thread: Re: [-mm patch] UNION_FS must depend on SLAB
• Next by thread: Re: [-mm patch] UNION_FS must depend on SLAB
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]