Re: Block layer still stack abuser?

On Thursday February 22, [email protected] wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 01:48:00PM +1100, Neil Brown wrote:
> > Might this:
> >    http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/2/10/22
> > 
> > relate to your question?
> > If you are talking about stacking block device (via dm or md), then a
> > patch to fix this in in -mm but there are or were some potential
> > issues in dm that seem to be holding it up.
> 
> What are the current blocking issues?  There are a lot of users of dm/md
> double-stacking (e.g. mirroring + multipath) that are in deep trouble
> currently and could be helped greatly with this patch.

All I know is what is in that mail message that I linked to.

NeilBrown
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Block layer still stack abuser?
    • From: Pierre Ossman <[email protected]>
  • Re: Block layer still stack abuser?
    • From: Neil Brown <[email protected]>
  • Re: Block layer still stack abuser?
    • From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [patch/rfc 0/6] rtc framework: remove class_device, use class suspend()/resume()
• Next by Date: [patch 6/6] rtc suspend()/resume() restores system clock
• Previous by thread: Re: Block layer still stack abuser?
• Next by thread: Re: Block layer still stack abuser?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]