Re: [Unionfs] Re: [-mm patch] UNION_FS must depend on SLAB

For what it's worth, the new branch-management code also needs realloc():
right now I do a kfree/kalloc instead.  So I'm all for having a true
krealloc function.

Erez.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: [-mm patch] UNION_FS must depend on SLAB
    • From: Josef Sipek <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [-mm patch] UNION_FS must depend on SLAB
• Next by Date: Re: High CPU usage with sata_nv
• Previous by thread: Re: [-mm patch] UNION_FS must depend on SLAB
• Next by thread: Re: [-mm patch] UNION_FS must depend on SLAB
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]