I need this for differing Option "XkbModel" in Xorg, so I can bind to each
device it's model and has correct xev's scancodes based on model.
So I prefer to have as Phis just only BDADDR, because for me this doesn't make
sense to have there device to which keyboard connect. Then I should have 1
section for each receiver, which is stupid.
Section "InputDevice"
Identifier "Bluetooth Keyboard"
Driver "kbd"
Option "Name" "Bluetooth HID Boot Protocol Device"
Option "Phis" "BDADDR"
Option "XkbRules" "xfree86"
Option "XkbModel" "dinovo"
Option "XkbLayout" "us"
EndSection
and so on for every other BT keyboard I own.
Michal
Dne středa 21 únor 2007 23:48 Dmitry Torokhov napsal(a):
> On 2/21/07, Marcel Holtmann <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi Dmitry,
> >
> > > > can anybody reply to this and share his/her opinion?
> > >
> > > Input core already exports uniq to udev and also via sysfs.
> >
> > so do you think it would be better to create phys as a string of the
> > source and destination address like "<src>-<dst>" for Bluetooth. And
> > then keep the uniq empty like all USB devices without serial number do?
>
> I'd keep uniq as is and do what you proposed with phys. This way you
> can either use uniq to identify your device while moving it from one
> receiver to another (if you have several) or do exact match on phys to
> get receiver/device pair.
>
> Does this make sense?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
