Re: [patch 1/2] sched: fix idle load balancing in softirqd context

On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 18:03:35 -0800
"Siddha, Suresh B" <[email protected]> wrote:

> +	int cpu = smp_processor_id(), idle_at_tick = idle_cpu(cpu);

argh.  Please, do

	int cpu = smp_processor_id();
	int idle_at_tick = idle_cpu(cpu);
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: [RFC] Patch: dynticks: idle load balancing
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC] Patch: dynticks: idle load balancing
    • From: "Siddha, Suresh B" <[email protected]>
  • [patch 1/2] sched: fix idle load balancing in softirqd context
    • From: "Siddha, Suresh B" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [PATCH] eCryptfs: resolve lower page unlocking problem
• Next by Date: Re: [patch 00/21] 2.6.19-stable review
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch 1/2] sched: fix idle load balancing in softirqd context
• Next by thread: [PATCH] Remove apparently unused IPDDP_DECAP kernel config variable.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]