On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 11:33:31AM +0000, David Howells wrote:
> Kawai, Hidehiro <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Is coredump_setting_sem a global semaphore? If so, it prevents concurrent
> > core dumping.
>
> No, it doesn't. Look again:
>
> int do_coredump(long signr, int exit_code, struct pt_regs * regs)
> {
> <setup vars>
>
> >>>> down_read(&coredump_settings_sem);
>
> > Additionally, while some process is dumped, writing to
> > coredump_omit_anon_shared of unrelated process will be blocked.
>
> Yes, but that's probably reasonable. How likely (a) is a process to coredump,
> and (b) is a coredump to occur simultaneously with someone altering their
> settings?
And (c) altering the setting during a core dump going to produce an
unusable core dump. I don't think the locking is that difficult to add
and it just makes sense. I would venture a guess that it will take less
time to actually do the locking than to continue arguing it is not needed
when it clearly appears it is needed for even a small number of cases.
Thanks,
Robin
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
