On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 05:27:14PM +0100, bert hubert ([email protected]) wrote:
> I've done so, with some interesting results. Source on
> http://ds9a.nl/tmp/recvtimings.c - be careful to adjust the '3000' divider
> to your CPU frequency if you care about absolute numbers!
>
> These are two groups, each consisting of 10 consecutive nonblocking UDP
> recvfroms, with 10 packets preloaded. Reported is the number of microseconds
> per recvfrom call which yielded a packet:
>
> $ ./recvtimings
> 4.142333
It can be recvfrom only problem - syscall overhead on my p4 (core duo,
debian testing) is bout 300 usec - to test I ran
read('dev/zero', &data, 0)
in a loop.
Could you try to hack recvfrom() for your socket to always copy some
empty buffer and check the results without waiting for packet?
If you are not hurry I can test it myself tomorrow.
--
Evgeniy Polyakov
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
