Re: [PATCH 07/44 take 2] [UBI] misc unit header

On Mon, 2007-02-19 at 11:00 +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > It's not clear the assertion is all that useful, but if you must have
> > it, why not do the check as an inline (with the assertion normally
> > turned off), and then call out to kmemdup()?
> 
> Agreement to all of the above.  And _please_ move all kdoc comments to
> the implementation files.

Will be done.

-- 
Best regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Битюцкий Артём)

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH 00/44 take 2] [UBI] Unsorted Block Images
    • From: Artem Bityutskiy <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH 07/44 take 2] [UBI] misc unit header
    • From: Artem Bityutskiy <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 07/44 take 2] [UBI] misc unit header
    • From: Theodore Tso <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 07/44 take 2] [UBI] misc unit header
    • From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] nfs: fix congestion control -v4
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 05/44 take 2] [UBI] internal common header
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 07/44 take 2] [UBI] misc unit header
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 07/44 take 2] [UBI] misc unit header
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]