Re: Racy NLS behaviour in FAT (and possible other fs)

OGAWA Hirofumi wrote:
> Yes. But sorry, I don't have any plan and time to fix it now.
>   

I know the feeling. :)

I just wanted to know where things stand as I have little insight into
vfat development.

> If you are using "iocharset=utf8" now, "codepage=cp???,iocharset=xxx,utf8"
> might help a bit.
>   

These tests was with the "utf8" option.

Rgds

-- 
     -- Pierre Ossman

  Linux kernel, MMC maintainer        http://www.kernel.org
  PulseAudio, core developer          http://pulseaudio.org
  rdesktop, core developer          http://www.rdesktop.org

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Racy NLS behaviour in FAT (and possible other fs)
    • From: Pierre Ossman <[email protected]>
  • Re: Racy NLS behaviour in FAT (and possible other fs)
    • From: OGAWA Hirofumi <[email protected]>
  • Re: Racy NLS behaviour in FAT (and possible other fs)
    • From: Pierre Ossman <[email protected]>
  • Re: Racy NLS behaviour in FAT (and possible other fs)
    • From: OGAWA Hirofumi <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [-mm patch] UNION_FS must depend on SLAB
• Next by Date: Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC][PATCH][2/4] Add RSS accounting and control
• Previous by thread: Re: Racy NLS behaviour in FAT (and possible other fs)
• Next by thread: [PATCH] ecryptfs ecryptfs_read_super path_lookup errh fix
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]