Re: [PATCH] aio: propogate post-EIOCBQUEUED errors to completion event

  I

*think* the patch is right, but picking the changes to the code and watching

its movement at the same time is making my head spin.

Really? The only things that changed are the assignment from iocb- >res (after testing pending_err) instead of the 'res' argument and the dprintk.

But, uh, sure. If it's a burden I can respin it as two patches. Here they come!

- z
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] aio: propogate post-EIOCBQUEUED errors to completion event
    • From: Zach Brown <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] aio: propogate post-EIOCBQUEUED errors to completion event
    • From: Benjamin LaHaise <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: <linux/socket.h>, <linux/stat.h> breakage: AF_* constants are part of ABI definition
• Next by Date: wierd bug, help decoding sysrq output?
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] aio: propogate post-EIOCBQUEUED errors to completion event
• Next by thread: RE: [PATCH] aio: propogate post-EIOCBQUEUED errors to completion event
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]