Re: [PATCH 10/44 take 2] [UBI] debug unit implementation

On Sat, 2007-02-17 at 22:00 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> This whole file looks like it can be removed, as nothing in here
> is really relevant for regular operation. I'm sure that much of it
> was a good help in developing the code and finding the bugs in here,
> but why would you want to merge it into the mainline kernel?

UBI is a new thing and it will likely be tweaked, improved, etc. When I
have a bugreport, I just ask to enable debugging and provide me the log.
I is a great help.

-- 
Best regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Битюцкий Артём)

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH 00/44 take 2] [UBI] Unsorted Block Images
    • From: Artem Bityutskiy <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH 10/44 take 2] [UBI] debug unit implementation
    • From: Artem Bityutskiy <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 10/44 take 2] [UBI] debug unit implementation
    • From: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [-mm patch] fix locking in __make_request (was Re: 2.6.20-mm2: Oops in generic_make_request)
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] override build timestamp
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 10/44 take 2] [UBI] debug unit implementation
• Next by thread: [PATCH 05/44 take 2] [UBI] internal common header
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]