Re: [ck] Re: 2.6.20-ck1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Con Kolivas wrote:
> Maintainers are far too busy off testing code for 
> 16+ cpus, petabytes of disk storage and so on to try it for themselves.  Plus 
> they worry incessantly that my patches may harm those precious machines' 
> performance... 
> 

But the one I like, mm-filesize_dependant_lru_cache_add.patch,
has an on-off switch.

In other words it adds an option to do things differently.
How could that possibly affect any workload if that option
isn't enabled?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux