On Fri, 16 Feb 2007, Siddha, Suresh B wrote:
> Periodic load balancing in recent kernels happen in the softirq.
> In certain -rt configurations, these softirqs are handled in softirqd
> context. And hence the check for idle processor was always returning
> busy (as nr_running > 1).
>
> This patch captures the idle information at the tick and passes this info
> to softirq context through an element 'idle_at_tick' in rq.
I haven't had the time yet to look too detailed at this patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Suresh Siddha <[email protected]>
> ---
>
> {
> unsigned long long now = sched_clock();
> struct task_struct *p = current;
> - int cpu = smp_processor_id();
> + int cpu = smp_processor_id(), idle_at_tick = idle_cpu(cpu);
> struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
>
But I would recommend that the idle_at_tick should be on a separate line.
I'll try to look deeper at your patches tomorrow. I've also found that I'm
having some latency problems in -rt that I think might be related to
migration.
-- Steve
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
