Re: [PATCH] i386 irq: Kill NR_IRQ_VECTORS and increase NR_IRQS

> Allowing the kernel to work on big machines without complicated
> and error prone irq remapping logic.

How much memory does this use by default? If it's much there should
be at least a CONFIG_* to make it smaller.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] i386 irq: Kill NR_IRQ_VECTORS and increase NR_IRQS
    • From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)

• References:
  • [PATCH] i386: irq: Kill IRQ compression
    • From: Len Brown <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH] i386 irq: Kill NR_IRQ_VECTORS and increase NR_IRQS
    • From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)

• Prev by Date: Re: [uml-devel] x86_64: fix 2.6.18 regression - PTRACE_OLDSETOPTIONS should be accepted
• Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [patch 14/21] Xen-paravirt: Add XEN config options and disable unsupported config options.
• Previous by thread: [PATCH] i386 irq: Kill NR_IRQ_VECTORS and increase NR_IRQS
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] i386 irq: Kill NR_IRQ_VECTORS and increase NR_IRQS
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]