Re: GPL vs non-GPL device drivers

On Thursday 15 February 2007, v j wrote:
>So far I have heard nothing but, "if you don't contribute, screw you."
>All this is fine. Just say so. Make it black and white. Make it
>perfectly clear what is and isn't legal. If we can't load proprietary
>modules, then so be it. It will help everybody if this is out in the
>clear, instead of resorting to stupid half measures like
>EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL.
>

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: GPL vs non-GPL device drivers
    • From: "Michael K. Edwards" <[email protected]>
  • Re: GPL vs non-GPL device drivers
    • From: "Scott Preece" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: GPL vs non-GPL device drivers
    • From: Theodore Tso <[email protected]>
  • Re: GPL vs non-GPL device drivers
    • From: "v j" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: sparse chokes on arch/i386/kernel/i8253.c (was: 2.6.20-mm1)
• Next by Date: [PATCH] add CONFIG_PNP=y to x86_64 defconfig
• Previous by thread: Re: GPL vs non-GPL device drivers
• Next by thread: Re: GPL vs non-GPL device drivers
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]