Re: Will smp alternative try to patch init text also?

On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 11:51:31AM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > So what happens if somebody builds a SMP kernel and runs on a UP machine.
> > Later it hotplus one CPU. Then kernel will switch to SMP mode. Looking
> > at the code it looks like it will also try to patch init text which is
> > no more there and will corrupt something else? 
> 
> There are range checks for both kernel (_text -> _etext) and modules
> (.text section).  Anything outside isn't patched.
> 

Oh... I missed that. Thanks.

Vivek
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Will smp alternative try to patch init text also?
    • From: Vivek Goyal <[email protected]>
  • Re: Will smp alternative try to patch init text also?
    • From: Gerd Hoffmann <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [patch 1/1] PM: Adds remount fs ro at suspend
• Next by Date: Re: [patch 00/11] ANNOUNCE: "Syslets", generic asynchronous system call support
• Previous by thread: Re: Will smp alternative try to patch init text also?
• Next by thread: [RFC] drivers/scsi/advansys.c: Unused variable?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]