Re: [PATCH]microcode update driver rewrite - takes 2

• To: "Shaohua Li" <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: [PATCH]microcode update driver rewrite - takes 2
• From: "Alex Riesen" <[email protected]>
• Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 11:41:56 +0100
• Cc: "Tigran Aivazian" <[email protected]>, [email protected]
• Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=my4TqfoIvnJzINjWju/FBS82sRnFbiu84dpEXZKlw738VwvQbiEQBvylTrlOX/mv+o3EEdHNLNcDqfipFwBMeDL207rJsoSQUQG2h4EVgQZIbX1IhVxnCXdLwdasXpWeKZZ0BN8OOnCWFd3DkmlRrJF7NO9vCjTV1sAz6xeZULk=
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]>
• Sender: [email protected]

On 6/27/06, Shaohua Li <[email protected]> wrote:

With the changes, we should put all intel-ucode/xx-xx-xx microcode files
into the firmware dir (I had a tool to split previous big data file into
small one and later we will release new style data file).

BTW, where this tool can be found? At the moment we seem to have
only microcode_ctl, and microcode.dat from it distribution is not understood
by the driver.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Prev by Date: Re: [patch 00/11] ANNOUNCE: "Syslets", generic asynchronous system call support
• Next by Date: Will smp alternative try to patch init text also?
• Previous by thread: [patch 0/2] natsemi: Support Aculab E1/T1 cPCI carrier cards
• Next by thread: Will smp alternative try to patch init text also?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]