Re: [PATCH] Fix d_path for lazy unmounts

On Wed, Feb 14, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:

> What's the point in reporting the rootfs at all -- it's never reachable to an 
> ordinary process?

/init and its childs has it as root, until it passes control over to
/sbin/init
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] Fix d_path for lazy unmounts
    • From: Andreas Gruenbacher <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] Fix d_path for lazy unmounts
    • From: Andreas Gruenbacher <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Fix d_path for lazy unmounts
    • From: Andreas Gruenbacher <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Fix d_path for lazy unmounts
    • From: Andreas Gruenbacher <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Fix d_path for lazy unmounts
• Next by Date: Re: [patch 00/11] ANNOUNCE: "Syslets", generic asynchronous system call support
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Fix d_path for lazy unmounts
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Fix d_path for lazy unmounts
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]