>
Just out of curiosity, why did you do this in such a manual way instead
of just using the UUID? I would think every time you replace a failed
drive you would have to go edit the files all over again.
Oh, there is a very simple reason for that.
These md arrays exist for a year of three allready, from the time I
used raidtool instead of mdadm.
So when I switched to to mdadm, I just got the /etc/raidtab file and
migrated it to /etc/mdadm.conf, since /etc/raidtab worked with
blockdevices and not UIDs (correct me if I am wrong and overlooked
this featute), the mdadm.conf ended up with these devices too.
Next to that, there is a, for me at least, practicle reason. I keep
adding harddisks, and when I use the block devices rather than UIDS,
and I get problems like yesterday, I have the blockdevice or serial
number of the disk, which makes it easier to look in my case where the
potential problem might be. If I work with UIDs and something goes
wrong when doing an mdadm --assemble, then I'll first have to look up
which disks belong to which UID, which costs time.
OR! which is also very possible, maybe there is a way easier way to
pinpoint which drives belong to which array before starting the array,
which I don't know about yet. So please, if you have suggestions, let
me know :)
Take care!
Patrick
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
