Re: [patch 10/21] Xen-paravirt: Name: dont export paravirt_ops structure, do individual functions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
Zachary Amsden wrote:
This turned out really hideous looking to me.  Can't we split the
struct into GPL'd and non-GPL'd functions instead?  We still have the
same granularity, and none of this function call to an indirect
function call nonsense.

It's not pretty, but I think having paravirt_ops and paravirt_ops_gpl
would be worse.  I'd be sympathetic to the idea of splitting
paravirt_ops up by function groupings, but splitting it by license seems
like a maintenance headache with no real upside.  Besides, patching will
solve everything (tm).

Ok. As long as we plan on patching CR2 and CR0 / clts accessors for FPU save during context switch and page fault paths in the future.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux