Re: [PATCH 2.6.21 review I] [11/25] x86: default to physical mode on hotplug CPU kernels

On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 04:10:44PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Basically as I commented in genapic_flat, that at least on hyperthreading
> cpus the destination mask is not always honored, and so if you only
> allow one hyperthread I have seen the irq show up on the other hyperthread.

Which platform is this? I haven't heard this before.

thanks,
suresh
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH 2.6.21 review I] [1/25] x86_64: Add __copy_from_user_nocache
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH 2.6.21 review I] [11/25] x86: default to physical mode on hotplug CPU kernels
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 2.6.21 review I] [11/25] x86: default to physical mode on hotplug CPU kernels
    • From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
  • Re: [PATCH 2.6.21 review I] [11/25] x86: default to physical mode on hotplug CPU kernels
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 2.6.21 review I] [11/25] x86: default to physical mode on hotplug CPU kernels
    • From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)

• Prev by Date: Re: [patch 3/3, resend] kbuild: correctly skip tilded backups in localversion files
• Next by Date: Re: libata FUA revisited
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 2.6.21 review I] [11/25] x86: default to physical mode on hotplug CPU kernels
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 2.6.21 review I] [11/25] x86: default to physical mode on hotplug CPU kernels
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]