[PATCH x86 for review III] [10/29] i386: don't include bugs.h

From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

That stupid non-inlined-static function in bugs.h causes:

include/asm/bugs.h:186: warning: 'check_bugs' defined but not used

But fortunately the include isn't needed.

Cc: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

---

 arch/i386/kernel/alternative.c |    1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

Index: linux/arch/i386/kernel/alternative.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/arch/i386/kernel/alternative.c
+++ linux/arch/i386/kernel/alternative.c
@@ -4,7 +4,6 @@
 #include <linux/list.h>
 #include <asm/alternative.h>
 #include <asm/sections.h>
-#include <asm/bugs.h>
 
 static int no_replacement    = 0;
 static int smp_alt_once      = 0;
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH x86 for review III] [10/29] i386: don't include bugs.h
    • From: Jörn Engel <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH x86 for review III] [1/29] i386: avoid gcc extension
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [PATCH x86 for review III] [4/29] x86_64: clean up sparsemem memory_present call
• Next by Date: [PATCH x86 for review III] [15/29] x86_64: Fix wrong gcc check in bitops.h
• Previous by thread: [PATCH x86 for review III] [4/29] x86_64: clean up sparsemem memory_present call
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH x86 for review III] [10/29] i386: don't include bugs.h
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]