Re: [PATCH 10/10] atomic.h : Add atomic64 cmpxchg, xchg and add_unless to x86_64

Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]> writes:
>  
>  /**
> @@ -402,7 +405,7 @@ static __inline__ long atomic64_sub_return(long i, atomic64_t *v)
>   */
>  #define atomic_add_unless(v, a, u)				\
>  ({								\
> -	int c, old;						\
> +	__typeof__((v)->counter) c, old;			\

This change seems useless. Please drop.

In general you should enforce atomic_t vs atomic64_t types on x86, otherwise
people will write code that won't compile on other architectures 
that have truly different implementations.

I would suggest using inlines.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 10/10] atomic.h : Add atomic64 cmpxchg, xchg and add_unless to x86_64
    • From: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH 00/10] atomic.h : standardizing atomic primitives
    • From: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH 10/10] atomic.h : Add atomic64 cmpxchg, xchg and add_unless to x86_64
    • From: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [GIT PATCH] SCSI updates for 2.6.20
• Next by Date: Re: [take35 0/10] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism.
• Previous by thread: [PATCH 10/10] atomic.h : Add atomic64 cmpxchg, xchg and add_unless to x86_64
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 10/10] atomic.h : Add atomic64 cmpxchg, xchg and add_unless to x86_64
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]