Re: [IA64] swiotlb abstraction (e.g. for Xen)

On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 09:14:25AM +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote:

> Xen the linux guest
> or
> Xen the hypervisor?
> 
> if it's the later, why on earth would we want to uglyfy linux for it?
> (arguably it holds in the former case as well)

Xen the hypervisor (i.e., dom0).

Cheers,
Muli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: [IA64] swiotlb abstraction (e.g. for Xen)
    • From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
  • Re: [IA64] swiotlb abstraction (e.g. for Xen)
    • From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
  • Re: [IA64] swiotlb abstraction (e.g. for Xen)
    • From: "Jan Beulich" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [IA64] swiotlb abstraction (e.g. for Xen)
    • From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [PATCH 1/7] containers (V7): Generic container system abstracted from cpusets code
• Next by Date: Re: [IA64] swiotlb abstraction (e.g. for Xen)
• Previous by thread: Re: [IA64] swiotlb abstraction (e.g. for Xen)
• Next by thread: Re: [IA64] swiotlb abstraction (e.g. for Xen)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]