Re: [PATCH 1/3] make queue_delayed_work() friendly to flush_fork()

On 02/11, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> 
> This makes impossible to use flush_fork(delayed_work->work) in addition
> to cancel_delayed_work/cancel_rearming_delayed_work, not good.

It turns out this patch is in fact bug-fix.

I didn't notice that we already have flush_fork(delayed_work) calls!

This means that
	workqueue-make-cancel_rearming_delayed_workqueue-work-on-idle-dwork.patch
	and this patch

should go just after
	implement-flush_work.patch

Sorry for inconvenience, please apply.

Oleg.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH 1/3] make queue_delayed_work() friendly to flush_fork()
    • From: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: md: md6_raid5 crash 2.6.20
• Next by Date: Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
• Previous by thread: [PATCH 1/3] make queue_delayed_work() friendly to flush_fork()
• Next by thread: [PATCH 3/3] ipvs: flush defense_work before module unload
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]