Re: [patch] linux/io.h: forward declare struct pci_dev

Al Viro wrote:

My current version:

From 97f115834b5ebef4f04e0f18aaa10f78f43733a0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Al Viro <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 23:41:09 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] sort the devres mess out

Split the implementation-agnostic stuff in separate files.
Make sure that targets using non-default request_irq() pull kernel/irq/devres.o
Mark targets that have no ioport_map() and friends, protect the ioport-related
Parts of lib/devres.o with corresponding ifdef (BTW, we need it in driver
dependencies in quite a few of cases, so that symbol was needed anyway).

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <[email protected]>

Thanks.  Sorry about causing trouble for many archs.  :-)

--
tejun
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [patch] linux/io.h: forward declare struct pci_dev
    • From: Heiko Carstens <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] linux/io.h: forward declare struct pci_dev
    • From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] linux/io.h: forward declare struct pci_dev
    • From: Tejun Heo <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] linux/io.h: forward declare struct pci_dev
    • From: Al Viro <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [patch] linux/io.h: forward declare struct pci_dev
• Next by Date: Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch] linux/io.h: forward declare struct pci_dev
• Next by thread: Re: [patch] linux/io.h: forward declare struct pci_dev
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]