Re: [patch 0/3] 2.6.20 fix for PageUptodate memorder problem (try 3)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2007-02-10 at 03:31 +0100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> SetNewPageUptodate does not do the S390 page_test_and_clear_dirty, so
> I'd like to make sure that's OK.

An I/O operation on s390 will set the dirty bit for a page. That is the
reason to have SetPageUptodate clear the per page dirty bit when the
page is made uptodate the first time. Otherwise we end up writing each
page back to its backing device at least once. If SetNewPageUptodate is
used on new anonymous pages exclusively I don't see a problem in
omitting the page_test_clear_dirty.

-- 
blue skies,
  Martin.

Martin Schwidefsky
Linux for zSeries Development & Services
IBM Deutschland Entwicklung GmbH

"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux