Re: [discuss] What will be in the x86-64/x86 2.6.21 merge

> Thanks, I scanned the list for 'calgary' and missed it. I'm guessing
> the Calgary got dropped because the Subject had 'x86-64 Calgary:' and
> your scripts trimmed the prefix?

Yes.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • What will be in the x86-64/x86 2.6.21 merge
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
  • Re: [discuss] What will be in the x86-64/x86 2.6.21 merge
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
  • Re: [discuss] What will be in the x86-64/x86 2.6.21 merge
    • From: Muli Ben-Yehuda <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [discuss] What will be in the x86-64/x86 2.6.21 merge
• Next by Date: Re: remote debugging via FireWire (was What will be in the x86-64/x86 2.6.21 merge)
• Previous by thread: Re: [discuss] What will be in the x86-64/x86 2.6.21 merge
• Next by thread: remote debugging via FireWire (was What will be in the x86-64/x86 2.6.21 merge)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]