Re: [PATCH 6c/10] lguest: the guest code

On Fri, 9 Feb 2007, Len Brown wrote:

> On Friday 09 February 2007 05:57, Rusty Russell wrote:
> 
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> > +       acpi_disabled = 1;
> > +       acpi_ht = 0;
> > +#endif
> 
> If this is hard-coded to have ACPI disabled, why isn't it enforced at build-time?

This is being disabled in the guest kernel only.  The host and guest 
kernels are expected to be the same build.



- James
-- 
James Morris
<[email protected]>

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 6c/10] lguest: the guest code
    • From: Len Brown <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH 0/10] lguest
    • From: Rusty Russell <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH 6b/10] lguest: the host code (lg.ko)
    • From: Rusty Russell <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH 6c/10] lguest: the guest code
    • From: Rusty Russell <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 6c/10] lguest: the guest code
    • From: Len Brown <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 01/34] __initdata cleanup - alpha
• Next by Date: Re: Sata_via problems in a Vintage2-AE1
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 6c/10] lguest: the guest code
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 6c/10] lguest: the guest code
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]