Re: One-shot high-resolution POSIX timer periodically late

John,

On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 16:25 +0100, John wrote:
> I'm confused: patch-2.6.16-rt29-tglx3 is dated 2006-09-07, yet there
> have been numerous revisions of the -rt patch set since then. Does that
> mean that no serious bugs have been found since September? Do the -rt
> patch sets for 2.6.17 - 2.6.20 only bring new features and/or adapt the
> -rt infrastructure to the newer kernels?

There were many bugs found, but mostly related to the newer versions of
the code or features, which have been added after 2.6.16-rt29. My -tglx
series has the back ports of fixes which were applicable to 2-6-16-rt29.

	tglx


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: One-shot high-resolution POSIX timer periodically late
    • From: John <[email protected]>
  • Re: One-shot high-resolution POSIX timer periodically late
    • From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
  • Re: One-shot high-resolution POSIX timer periodically late
    • From: John <[email protected]>
  • Re: One-shot high-resolution POSIX timer periodically late
    • From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
  • Re: One-shot high-resolution POSIX timer periodically late
    • From: John <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [PATCH] hpet: trivial __iomem annotations
• Next by Date: [PATCH] misc NULL noise removal
• Previous by thread: Re: One-shot high-resolution POSIX timer periodically late
• Next by thread: [PATCH][RFC] incorrect direct io error handling (v3)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]