Re: [rfc][patch 0/3] a faster buffered write deadlock fix?

On Thu,  8 Feb 2007 14:07:15 +0100 (CET) Nick Piggin <[email protected]> wrote:

> So I have finally finished a first slightly-working draft of my new aops
> op (perform_write) proposal. I would be interested to hear comments about
> it.  Most of my issues and concerns are in the patch headers themselves,
> so reply to them.
> 
> The patches are against my latest buffered-write-fix patchset.

What happened with Linus's proposal to instantiate the page as pinned,
non-uptodate, unlocked and in pagecache while we poke the user address?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [rfc][patch 0/3] a faster buffered write deadlock fix?
    • From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [rfc][patch 0/3] a faster buffered write deadlock fix?
    • From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: gigaset build broken on current linux-2.6.git
• Next by Date: Re: [patch] i386/x86_64: smp_call_function locking inconsistency
• Previous by thread: Re: [rfc][patch 0/3] a faster buffered write deadlock fix?
• Next by thread: Re: [rfc][patch 0/3] a faster buffered write deadlock fix?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]